The future suburb of 100,000 with no train station

With mammoth builds to transform the State’s rail network, communities beyond Cranbourne still feel left out of train access with the continued silence on the Clyde Rail Link.

Growth areas Clyde and Clyde North have a current population of over 40,000 and are expected to have just under 110,000 by 2031 – yet these towns still lack a train station.

Chalm Davey, the sales associate of Verve, a developing estate in Clyde, said one of three people coming into the office would ask about the potential Clyde Station.

The fledging estate along Pattersons Road is eight kilometres away from the Cranbourne Station, which would take residents about an hour to go by bus, the only public transport option in the area.

“Once a Clyde Station is up and going, it’ll be four kilometres from us,” she said.

“At the moment, we have to say to our clients we don’t have any details around the Clyde station, recommending them go to the Cranbourne Station, but that’s twice the distance away.

“Even if you are driving to the Cranbourne Station, I think it’s about a 20-minute drive from here. A 10-minute drive to a Clyde Station would be a lot nicer.”

The estate now has 200 lots with a total of 1100 lots projected. Surrounding estates also have thousands of lots in the pipeline.

With the demand and growth remaining strong in the area, Ms Davey believed that a Clyde Station would no doubt benefit the residents.

Even many beyond Clyde stand to benefit, among them would be the residents of Kooweerup which would have an alternative public transport link other than Pakenham.

Some have campaigned for the rail link for some time, Travis Mitchell of the Restore ‘Rup Rail campaign has been pushing for trains to return all the way to the town of the old swamp.

“It would lead to people getting easier access to their jobs, education and recreation,” he said.

“The roads in Clyde are largely the same as they were 30 years ago. Buses are in traffic, people are just stuck in their cars.

“People rely on getting a bus to Pakenham, all the way down through Bass Coast, all the effort when there is a perfectly good rail corridor close by.”

A prospective project would benefit from taking over from the long-decommissioned South Gippsland Line which still stretches – unused and derelict – between Cranbourne and Clyde.

Casey Council has long been advocating for an extension of the line to Clyde. Back in 2022, Casey’s plan pitched a duplicated line across about 5 kilometres with three new stations: Cranbourne East, Casey Fields and Clyde.

With a then-estimated cost of $1.5 to $3 billion, the State Opposition put down a commitment of just under $1 billion if elected in the last election.

“They would be building Clyde Station as we speak and planning for the line to go to Kooweerup,” Mitchell said.

“All the funds at the moment seem to be in the Suburban Rail Loop which has no benefit for people beyond Cranbourne who have no connection to it.”

With the Liberal party failing to achieve Government, the project has largely fallen to silence since – with the State Government yet to even hint at the prospective extension.

Ms Davey said that the envisioned Clyde Station had now almost become a running joke.

“It’s actually pretty awkward because we do actually have the fact that there will be a future Clyde Station on a lot of our printouts, and then people will ask about the timeframe,” she said.

“It creates a level of awkwardness for us in the explanation, and we’re having to turn to a running joke pretty much. Because that’s what it is really.

“Just a running joke about when the Clyde Station will arrive.”

The Pakenham Line recently added the East Pakenham Station, which currently services a precinct with approximately a thousand residents – but is made in anticipation of the over 8,000 expected to live in the new suburb by 2031. Residents beyond Cranbourne are questioning when the Clyde Rail Link will serve a much more established area with an existing considerable number of residents.

Public transport advocate and former Department of Transport bus planner Peter Parker said from a purely patronage point of view, the new East Pakenham station didn’t seem to currently make much sense.

However, he noted that the add-up of the new station served other purposes.

“The Pakenham Line has both Metro and V/Line trains. Delays to one delayed the other. That can have knock-on effects across Melbourne, including the Metro Tunnel. Having trains sharing tracks or having to wait for other trains also makes it harder to schedule frequent timetables needed to ensure capacity,” he said.

“East Pakenham station is the most publicly visible but the least important part of that project. The really important part of it was reconfiguring all the tracks at Pakenham. This has many benefits including allowing trains to cross without delay and helping Metro trains turn back. That delivers better reliability and potentially frequency.

“Another factor was that the HCMT trains are already stabled further east. Thus there was already overhead wiring at East Pakenham. That reduced the cost of the project. And, being linked with the Metro Tunnel project it was probably an easier sell to government.”

As for Clyde Rail Link, Mr Parker believed that Clyde absolutely should get a rail extension along with improved buses.

“Preparatory work has been done at Cranbourne, like the duplication project, to make it logical that Clyde should be next. As far as I know, there are no significant difficulties to it happening. All it requires is a political commitment and funding,” he said.

“The current government is beset by budget blow-outs and has borrowed heavily. 

“It is heavily committed to existing big projects like the West Gate Tunnel, North-East Link and the SRL. I suspect its appetite for further big projects is limited, especially with concerns over funding for other areas like health.

“If the government wants to announce rail for Clyde, I guess that they’ll hold off until nearer the 2026 election campaign.”

Shadow Minister for Public Transport Matthew Guy said the State Government had ‘wrong priorities’.

“The Clyde rail link is hugely overdue, but while the state government pumps every dollar they have toward the Suburban Rail Loop, this vital link won’t be built,” Mr Guy said.

“The state government has the wrong priorities as they focus on a $50 billion suburban rail loop for areas that already have trains and forget those like Clyde who don’t have any trains and badly need them now.”

The lack of commitment may be more than priorities, but factors of conservation may have the State Government’s hands-tied.

Ever since 2013, the area of the old rail line in Clyde has been designated as a conservation area to be taken over and retained by the State Government in the future.

Within the Melbourne Strategic Assessment, the area is deemed to project such species like the Maroon Leek-Orchid.

A potential project will likely involve duplicating the line, to Grassy Plains Network Facilitator Adrian Marshall it seems unlikely that both projects can be mediated.

“Old roads and cemeteries have really good conservation values and places like the old rail line are some of the best areas for grasslands, their vegetation is pristine,” he said.

“There are real values there and south east of it is really good habitat which it connects to.

“In theory, it could work, but as they would more than likely duplicate it they would have to smash the area.”

Regardless of the potential conflict between conservation and urbanisation, the wider South East backs Casey’s advocacy.

“One of Cardinia Shire Council’s key advocacy priorities is better public transport. We call on the State Government to plan and fund well-planned public transport services across our diverse shire,” said Cardinia Shire Council’s general manager Governance, Facilities and Economy, Debbie Tyson.

“The provision of new stations at Cranbourne East, Clyde and Clyde North will provide many Cardinia residents with alternative metropolitan public transport options and we support the City of Casey’s advocacy efforts to have this new rail link constructed.”

City of Casey chair of administrators Nolene Duff PSM said the Council had been advocating for the Clyde Rail Link for many years and continued to seek a commitment from the Federal and State governments to construct the duplicated rail extension from Cranbourne to Clyde. 

“This project is key to alleviating congestion on roads, providing alternative transport options, and connecting the growing communities of Cranbourne East, Clyde North and Clyde to essential services,” she said.

“The project also aligns with climate action goals, improved liveability, and will provide greater access to Casey stadiums and the new Cranbourne Community Hospital.”

Ms Duff said the estimated cost by the Council was now $3 billion to $5 billion, double the evaluation before the last election.

“The Casey community have shown a strong desire to see this project start, and while the Council estimates a cost of $3-5 billion, the project will deliver hundreds of jobs and stimulate the local economy,” she said.

“The Clyde Rail Link represents an opportunity to create a lasting legacy for the southeast region and act as a catalyst for positive urban renewal that reinvigorates and connects communities.”

The State Government was contacted for comment.

(Berwick Star)

8 thoughts on “The future suburb of 100,000 with no train station

  1. This issue has been going on for over a decade with the ALP pulling up a lot of the line and damaging a lot of infrastructure. There is little sense than to reopen to Kooweerup as the first stage as a single track and then upgrade later. Double track is not required for the service frequency with good timetables making it work.

    Upgrade to double track later.

  2. Totally agree. Actually ‘Beyond a Joke’. We are the laughing stock really. Every other country is fast moving towards zero emissions with Fast Electric Rail Services between major Cities & States. What’s happen in poor old Australia? Closing & demolishing Rail Corridors for a ridiculous Rail Trail that could be constructed adjacent to the Rail Corridors. (Welcome & Free to Share, Copy & Paste my Comment wherever you wish). Put it out there. Hopefully the bean counters of the State & Federal Govts take notice. But not expecting any real immediate action other than the usual Election Promises of investigation & investment in to Fast Rail. Particularly when both the Trucking & Coach Industries are coughing up donations to the Politicians individual Parties to downgrade & keep Rail Transport out of the Political spectrum. That’s why we are becoming a 3rd World class when it comes to Rail Transport. (NO Sarcastic or offensive Comments please).

  3. Jeff Kennett didn’t close this line, trains were still able to run on It after he lost office.

    The Brumby Government started tearing up sections for their Desel pipeline project In 2009 (removed sections were never replaced)

    Many sections have since been removed for utility renewals and road upgrades (again removed sections were not replaced)

  4. To be honest, the Victorian LNP needs to get their act together. Cut the conservative social politics garbage and hound Labor on transport and housing. People would actually vote them in if they had policies to support more first home buyers. Better public transport policies than Labor is easy, like changing the suburban rail loop into a light rail/tram or utilising the former loop railway line. And then focused the cost savings on extending lines including this, Upfield to Wallan, Alamein to Hughesdale, Mernda to Whittlesea, as well as preparing an extension of Glen Waverley to Ferntree Gully. Extensions to the tram network, like Balwyn North to Doncaster and Airport West to Tullamarine Airport, and removing the unnecessary amount of stops so that the network is quicker. People would see better value for money in this.

  5. This extension is simpler that being touted is my view.

    We will never remove all regional level crossings and should not. KooWeeRup is a rural location being added to Melbourne why not just run a single electrified line from Cranbourne to KWR with stations rebuilt and passing loops at the stations with central platform. Central platforms save money and are cheaper to maintain. Tracks either side of the platform for up and down trains.

    Nothing overly expensive making it practical.

    Later with more expansion add a second track. The number of trains on the section would not require level crossing removal.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *